By Florida State Rep. Meg Weinberger
Florida lawmakers are currently deliberating on two vital pieces of legislation—SB 1830 and HB 1481—collectively referred to as the Make America’s Dogs Safe Again (MADSA) legislation.
These bills are designed to introduce accountability and transparency into the state’s dog breeding practices, establishing minimum standards that ensure dogs are raised in humane, healthy environments and sold by responsible breeders.
Despite the clear advantages these measures offer for both animal welfare and consumer protection, the American Kennel Club (AKC) has taken a firm stance against them. This
Opposition prioritizes breeders’ interests over the well-being of animals and the public. Clarifying what these bills truly represent is essential.
Labeling these proposals as “extreme anti-breeder bills” is entirely misleading. The legislation specifically targets individuals who breed dogs for sale or exchange and does not impact responsible breeders who already adhere to high standards.
The aim is straightforward: to ensure that all dog breeders in Florida practice ethical and humane breeding, effectively cracking down on puppy mills and substandard operations that neglect animal welfare.
The irony here is that we actually used the AKC website as a reference when crafting this bill. We sought to base our legislation on established guidelines and best practices to protect both dogs and consumers. This support for high standards serves as a cornerstone of our efforts to ensure a better future for dogs in Florida.
Opponents of SB 1830 and HB 1481 describe them as an “overreaching breeder regulation,” but this characterization misses the mark. In reality, the bills promote a balanced approach requiring registration, inspections, and clear care protocols—basic safeguards that protect both animals and consumers alike. Just as we regulate daycare centers and nursing homes to ensure proper treatment, it’s our moral responsibility to ensure that animals bred for sale receive the care they deserve.
Another misconception is that the legislation excludes expert breeders from the conversation. In fact, it actively seeks input from a diverse array of public-interest stakeholders, including local governments and animal rescue organizations—groups that directly address the fallout of unregulated breeding.
This collaborative approach aims to create a thoughtful and effective regulatory framework that promotes everyone’s interests instead of sidelining any group.
Concerns about privacy in relation to a public dog breeder database have been raised, but it’s crucial to view this registry as a tool for transparency rather than a threat. A public registry allows consumers to identify reputable breeders, deters unethical practices, and fosters trust in the breeding community, much like licensing does in countless other professions. It’s not just about protecting animals; it’s about safeguarding the public as well, which is It’s not just about protecting animals; it’s about safeguarding the public as well, which is a sensible and fair policy.
Ultimately, SB 1830 and HB 1481 are rational steps toward fostering a more transparent, humane, and accountable dog breeding environment in Florida.
We can only understand the world based on what we are exposed to, and unfortunately, many are not educated about the humane treatment of living beings. Every creature deserves to be treated with compassion and respect. I will always advocate for those who cannot speak for themselves.
Let’s champion animal welfare.
Let’s create safe breeding environments.
Let’s Make America’s Dogs Safe Again.
Representative Meg Weinberger was elected to the Florida House in 2024, representing District 94, Palm Beach Gardens.
Author
