Last week, U.S. Sens. Rick Scott, R-Fla., and Tim Scott, R-SC, wrote a letter to the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) requesting a review of the Medicaid Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program, which was created to eliminate improper Medicaid payments.
“Over the last decade, there has been little oversight of this program and a review is needed to ensure it is working effectively and in the best interest of American taxpayers,” Rick Scott’s office noted.
The letter is below.
Dear Comptroller General Dodaro:
Thank you for everything you do in the pursuit of greater transparency and accountability within the federal government. Making Washington work for families across the nation is a top priority, and we are working every day to make sure taxpayers get the best return on their investment.
Since its creation in 1965, Medicaid has experienced significant growth in both the size of the population it serves and its cost. In 1970, Medicaid accounted for 1.4 percent of the federal budget. By 1978, Medicaid covered approximately 9 percent of the total U.S. population. By 2018, more than 25 percent of the U.S. population was enrolled in Medicaid/ Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Combined, Medicaid and CHIP accounted for 17.2 percent of national health expenditures in Calendar Year 2017 and almost 10 percent of total federal spending. Medicaid’s size, growth, and its complexity have led GAO to classify it as a high-risk program since 2003.
In 2003, Congress created a pilot program in Medicare for recovery audit contractors to help eliminate waste, and after three years, the program corrected more than $1.03 billion in improper Medicare payments. In 2010, Congress extended the Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program into Medicaid as a means to stop improper payments.
Unfortunately, over the last decade, there has been little oversight of the Medicaid RAC program. We are requesting that GAO review the Medicaid RAC program and answer the following questions:
1. How have states used the Medicaid RAC program to address strategic program integrity needs, including audits of managed care, and what are the lessons learned?
2. What steps do the states and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) take to coordinate state Medicaid RAC program audits and other program integrity efforts? This includes existing Medicaid integrity programs such as the Unified Program Integrity Contractors, Payment Error Rate Measurement program, state auditors and Medicaid Fraud Control Units.
3. How do states and CMS oversee the Medicaid RAC program and what mechanisms are in place to appropriately refer suspected cases of fraud?
Thank you for continuing to work to eliminate waste in the federal government to make Washington work better for all families. We look forward to hearing from you.
Author
