This week, U.S. Rep. Scott Franklin, R-Fla., said he will champion the “Congressional Review Act (CRA)”with the backing of some members of the Florida delegation.
The proposal expresses “disapproval to prevent the USDA from withholding school lunch funding and retaliating against schools that do not comply with the White House’s sexual orientation and gender identity policies.”
Franklin offered his reasons for the proposal this week.
“While the Biden White House stoops so low as to use school lunch as leverage in a political game to intimidate school systems into adopting their woke agenda, we’ve worked hard in Florida to kick progressive culture wars out of the classroom and keep parents in charge,” Franklin said. “We don’t coparent with the federal government. The USDA does not have the authority to impose LGBTQ ideology and dangerous social experiments like shared bathrooms and locker rooms in local schools. I thank my colleagues for joining me to hold the Biden administration accountable for this abuse of power.”
U.S. Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kansas, is championing the proposal in the upper chamber.
“In Joe Biden’s America public schools must support Democrats’ radical transgender movement or they’re at risk of losing substantial funding. This president is relentless in forcing his misaligned values on the American people and children. We must stop this policy dead in its tracks to protect access to school lunches for students across the country and send a clear message to this administration: stop weaponizing the federal government in your pursuit of indoctrinating children. The USDA has no authority to require biological boys to be given access to girl’s bathrooms and locker rooms, nor do they have the power to allow biological boys to compete against biological girls in girls’ sports,” Marshall said, who is sponsoring this legislation in the Senate.
Among the more than 15 co-sponsors are Florida Republican U.S. Reps. Gus Bilirakis, Bill Posey and Greg Steube.
“Forcing schools to accept the woke agenda by withholding school lunch money for underprivileged kids is wrong and unacceptable. Congress must repeal this effort to extort our school districts,” Posey said.
“The federal school lunch program provides essential nutrition for many of Florida’s most vulnerable children. For some, it is the only consistent meal they can rely upon,” Bilirakis said. “This critical program should not be held hostage by the Biden Administration’s continued attempts to force its liberal ideology and a woke agenda down the throats of all Americans.”
Franklin’s office offered some of the details leading up to his proposal.
:In January 2021 President Biden issued Executive Order 13988, directing federal agencies to review, revise, suspend or rescind any agency policy that did not align with his administration’s sexual orientation and gender identity agenda,” Franklin’s office noted. “Pursuant to the president’s order, in May 2022 the USDA announced it will interpret the word ‘sex’ in Title IX to mean ‘sexual orientation and gender identity.’ As a result, “state and local agencies, program operators and sponsors that receive funds from the Food and Assistance Service (FNS) must investigate allegations of discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation. Those organizations must also update their non-discrimination policies and signage to include prohibitions against discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation.
“The FNS administers the National School Lunch Program provided low-cost and free lunches to 29.6 million children at nearly 100,000 public and nonprofit private schools in fiscal year 2019,”the congressman’s office added. “Franklin’s legislation utilizes the Congressional Review Act to rescind the USDA’s recent policy. A CRA resolution of disapproval is a special legislative procedure that allows Congress to claw back executive or agency action while providing clarity on the agency’s statutory authority. When enacted, it also prohibits the agency from any similar rulemaking in the future.”
The attorneys general of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia and West Virginia have sued the administration on the matter.
Heritage Action, Alliance Defending Freedom and CatholicVote are backing the proposal.
Author
